Every investigations firm today uses some form of artificial intelligence. Few tell their clients exactly how, where, and within what limits. This page exists for that.
At IEC, artificial intelligence is a processing tool, never a source of conclusions. No credibility determination, no weighing of evidence and no disciplinary recommendation is produced by a model: each one carries the judgment and signature of an investigator who can defend it in person, including before a court.
The reason is not mere prudence: it is evidentiary. A finding your company cannot explain or defend protects no one. Professional responsibility is not delegated to an algorithm.
In every use, the tool’s output is an input the investigator verifies against the original source before it touches the file.
This site sets no tracking cookies and no advertising analytics. The contact form travels from your browser to IEC infrastructure, with no third-party form processors. Scheduling and the initial assessment operate on the minimum data necessary.
This is not cosmetic: a firm that asks you to entrust your most sensitive matters should be able to show that its own operation practices what it recommends.
Every IEC report declares its standard of proof and carries the signature of the person who answers for it. If a finding of ours cannot be explained to you, your board or a judge, that finding should never have left this firm.
José Alberto Acevedo Cerón · Director of InvestigationsWe gladly answer them before any engagement, including review of our confidentiality agreements by your legal team.
Contact the firmThis site sets no tracking cookies and no advertising analytics. The only thing stored, in your own browser, is the record that you read this notice. Consistent with our privacy notice.