Home / Regulatory observatory
Regulatory observatoryWhat is in force, which deadlines apply, what changed and what is coming. One page a legal director can consult before the next complaint, maintained by those who investigate under these laws.
Framework in force
What it requires
Deadlines that decide
Decree published in the Official Gazette reforming the LFT and sixteen other statutes. Mandatory training for all staff, in force since January 16.
A bill approved by the Senate Labor Committee in December 2025 would add the concept of workplace violence to the LFT: mobbing, cyberbullying, and duties to prevent and repair. Pending a floor vote.
Training without records does not evidence compliance. And once the workplace-violence reform passes, a protocol covering only sexual harassment will fall short.
Framework in force
What it requires
Deadlines that decide
Labor Directorate Ruling 57/04: the thirty days are administrative business days; responsibilities defined where contractors and temporary-services firms are involved.
Consolidation of Labor Directorate doctrine. Courts have already upheld fines for exceeding the statutory deadline, even where the delay had a practical justification.
Chile is the jurisdiction where the clock decides. A missed deadline taints the procedure even when the conduct is proven.
Framework in force
What it requires
Deadlines that decide
Law 2466, labor reform: a new chapter on violence, harassment and discrimination at work, with reinforced employer prohibitions.
Ministry of Labor enforcement on protocol integration into the SG-SST. Companies still routing sexual-harassment complaints through the coexistence committee face procedural risk.
The coexistence committee was designed for workplace harassment. Sexual harassment requires its own procedure, and many companies still conflate the two.
Framework in force
What it requires
Deadlines that decide
Supreme Decree 021-2021-MIMP: amends the regulation and specifies procedural stages. No substantive regulatory changes verified in 2026.
Change comes through enforcement: SUNAFIL criteria on deadlines, committee composition and complaint handling.
Peru has the shortest deadlines in the region. Without a committee formed and trained before the first complaint, they cannot be met.
| Country | Core statute | Investigation deadline | Authority | External investigator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mexico | LFT · C190 · NOM-035 | 30 days to act on the ground | Labor courts · STPS | Permitted; not expressly regulated |
| Chile | Law 21.643 | 30 business days | Labor Directorate | Permitted; alternative: refer to the DT |
| Colombia | Law 2365 · Law 2466 | Per SG-SST protocol | Ministry of Labor | Expressly contemplated |
| Peru | Law 27942 | 30 calendar days | SUNAFIL | Internal committee mandatory; external support permitted |
General reference prepared by IEC from official sources and administrative doctrine. It is not legal advice for a specific matter and does not replace professional review of your protocol. If you spot an inaccuracy or an unreflected change, please write to contact@iecadvisory.com.
A quarterly email analysis of what changed across the four countries and what it demands of your company. No noise, no selling, with judgment.
Your email only. Unsubscribe anytime; we never share your address.
This site sets no tracking cookies and no advertising analytics. The only thing stored, in your own browser, is the record that you read this notice. Consistent with our privacy notice.